The recent report titled "The Future of European Competitiveness" released by the European Commission has sent ripples of concern throughout the continentThis document starkly highlights a growing crisis with statements asserting that since 2000, the growth rate of real disposable income per capita in the United States has been almost double that of the European Union (EU). Moreover, among the top fifty technology companies globally, only a meager four are EuropeanThis alarming reality raises fundamental questions about the future economic trajectory of Europe, suggesting that a deep, sweeping transformation is urgently required.

Former Italian Prime Minister and the architect of this vital report, Mario Draghi, has expressed a passionate commitment to revitalize the European economyDraghi, who previously served as the President of the European Central Bank, emphasizes that three key external conditions historically bolstering Europe's prosperity—open markets, affordable energy, and a stable geopolitical environment—have eroded

Advertisements

He warns that the EU is now confronting formidable challenges that necessitate substantial investments and innovative policy frameworks to preserve competitiveness on a worldwide scale.

Central to the report is the grim outlook for European industriesThe document outlines mounting pressures in both energy and technology sectors, which are crucial for future growthIn terms of energy, European industrial electricity costs surpass those in the United States by 158%, while natural gas expenses are an astonishing 345% higherThis unsustainable scenario forces major energy-intensive industries in Europe to consider scaling down or shutting down their operations altogetherFor instance, Slovak Aluminum Company, boasting seventy years of history, has ceased its primary aluminum productionIn Germany, chemical giant BASF has closed two ammonia plants, resulting in substantial layoffs at its key Ludwigshafen facility

Advertisements

The ceramic and cement sectors in Spain are also experiencing significant downturns, further painting a dire picture of industry health across Europe.

The report also highlights disconcerting disparities in the technology landscapeEurope lags behind the United States in pharmaceutical developments, with private sector investments in drug research constituting only 0.11% of the EU's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), compared to 0.45% in the U.SFurthermore, the time frame for approving new drugs in the U.Sis 334 days on average, while the EU takes about 430 daysIn the realm of digital technology, the findings are equally sobering; three major American tech firms dominate over 65% of the European cloud market, with the continent’s largest cloud operator capturing a mere 2%. Quantum computing, heralded as the next frontier for innovation, currently showcases a complete absence of EU representation among the top ten global investors in this emerging field.

Given the widening competitive gap, the report calls for substantial investment to reverse the downward trend

Advertisements

It recommends the EU is in dire need of an annual increase of €750 billion to €800 billion in investment, elevating the EU's total investment share of GDP to 5%. These investments would target technology innovation, green energy, and digital transformation with the aim of securing Europe’s place in the global competitive arenaDraghi asserts that this level of investment has not been observed in Europe for half a century and stresses the importance of collaboration between the private sector and public financing to achieve this goal.

In addition to increasing financial resources, the report suggests easing regulatory constraints on businesses to bolster global competitivenessDraghi advocates for reform of the EU’s competition policies, proposing a more forward-thinking and flexible approach that enables European companies to thrive in competition with counterparts from the U.S

• Global Markets Face Growing Uncertainty
• Europe's Electric Vehicle Revolution: A Race Against Time
• Surge in Gold Prices
• Japan Expected to Raise Interest Rates in March
• Commodity Price Retreat

and ChinaFurthermore, he calls for a timely evaluation of existing EU regulations, to ensure that firms do not suffer from excessive bureaucracyThis process should prioritize alleviating redundancies across the legislative chain and focus on sectors most vulnerable to international competition.

The report also includes a call for reforming the historically slow and often cumbersome decision-making processes within the EUIt suggests adopting qualified majority voting in more areas to move away from the current, often prohibitive requirement for unanimous agreementAdditionally, the report proposes allowing like-minded nations to take separate action on specific projects, enhancing policy flexibility and efficiency across the EU.

Reactions to the report are mixed across EuropeUrsula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, has suggested that the document lays a foundational strategy for the future of European industrial policy, particularly within the energy and technology sectors

She emphasizes that enhancing Europe’s competitive edge is not merely an economic imperative but must align with social equity, urging national governments to support these suggested investment initiatives.

Peter Adrian, President of the German Chamber of Commerce, praised Draghi's guidance as vital for elevating European competitivenessBy delineating strengths and weaknesses, the report provides a comprehensive view of the challenges the EU will face in the coming decadesHe noted that addressing high energy costs, bureaucratic hurdles, and slow digital transformation would be particularly beneficial for the EU economy.

However, the proposed large-scale investments hinge on initiating collective borrowing among EU member states, a notion that has raised alarm among some stakeholdersFinance Minister Christian Lindner of Germany articulated strong opposition just hours after the report’s release

He stressed that Germany would not endorse any plans that could increase EU debt, arguing that Europe’s issues stem not from a lack of funding but from excessive bureaucracyLindner stated, “More government debt means higher interest but does not necessarily translate into greater growth.” Germany’s stance reflects the view that Draghi’s proposals of increasing debt and centralizing decision-making would do little to bolster competitiveness.

European media opinions diverge markedly, with some analysts arguing that the EU is beset by various pressures, making the prospect of fundamental change appear dauntingGermany, often seen as the economic engine of Europe, is mired in its own challenges, while France carries a heavy burden of public debt, exacerbating a fractured political climateMany of Draghi's recommendations will require consensus from all EU member states, a consensus that is predicted to be challenging to achieve